All Researchers
Chelsia Shanen Panekenan

Elementary Education Researcher

Chelsia Shanen Panekenan

Where school rituals wound and AI can either widen the gap or heal it — the teacher's critical empathy is what decides.

chelsia@afirmasi.org
San Marcos, Texas, USA · Indonesia

About

Chelsia Shanen Panekenan works at the intersection of childhood identity formation, critical pedagogy, and the ethics of AI in elementary education — a research space that is rarely populated with the intellectual urgency it deserves.

An LPDP Scholar pursuing her Master of Arts in Elementary Education at Texas State University (August 2025 – May 2027), Chelsia has maintained a perfect academic record across both completed terms: GPA 4.00/4.00, across coursework spanning Science Curriculum, Advanced Early Childhood Development, Multicultural Teaching and Learning, Second Language Acquisition and Development, Human Development, and English as a Second Language Teaching and Materials.

Her academic formation is both quantitatively rigorous and qualitatively deep. She is trained in the ethnographic and critical theoretical traditions that allow her to ask the questions most educational technology researchers avoid: not just whether AI works in classrooms, but what it does to the identity of the child sitting in front of it — especially the child who has already been told, through ritual and routine, that they do not quite belong.

In April 2026, Chelsia presented her paper at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting in Los Angeles — one of the most prestigious venues in global education research. Her work, presented in the Roundtable Session "Teaching with AI: Identities, Challenges, and Burnout," directly confronts the ethical stakes of AI in education through the lens of figured worlds, class hegemony, and the lasting psychological damage of school shaming rituals.

She brings to AFIRMASI what most AI-in-education researchers lack: a humanizing lens. Her work insists that before any technology enters a classroom, we must ask what emotional and social architecture already exists in that room — and whether the technology will reinforce it or disrupt it for the better.

Activity Gallery

AERA 2026 Annual Meeting — Los Angeles, CA

AERA 2026 Annual Meeting — Los Angeles, CA

Elementary classroom observation — critical pedagogy field research

Elementary classroom observation — critical pedagogy field research

Texas State University — graduate seminar on AI ethics in education

Texas State University — graduate seminar on AI ethics in education

Community outreach — humanizing pedagogy workshop for young learners

Community outreach — humanizing pedagogy workshop for young learners

Vision

An educational system — and an AI ecosystem — where no child's identity is wounded by the very institution meant to develop it. Where technology enters classrooms already held accountable to the emotional and social realities of the children inside them.

Mission

Research the ethical dimensions of AI in elementary education with the same rigor we apply to curriculum design. Train educators to be critical filters, not passive adopters. Center the experiences of children from marginalized communities in every design decision about educational technology.

Why AFIRMASI?

Because AFIRMASI asks the uncomfortable questions about AI in education — not just 'does it work' but 'who does it work for, and at whose expense.' That is exactly the question my research is built around. The intersection of identity, schooling, and emerging technology is not a boutique academic interest — it is the central ethical challenge of our moment in education. AFIRMASI is where that challenge can be addressed with both scientific rigor and genuine humanistic commitment.

Field Impact

Chelsia's AERA 2026 paper — presented to an international audience of education researchers in Los Angeles — makes a precise and urgent argument: the harm inflicted by school rituals like public shaming is not merely anecdotal, it is structural and identity-shaping. And AI, without critical ethical filtering, is positioned to replicate and amplify those same harms at scale. Her conclusion is not pessimistic — it is actionable. She argues that a teacher's own experience of harm, when processed through critical empathy, becomes the very foundation of a humanizing pedagogy capable of evaluating and governing educational technology with moral seriousness. This framework directly informs AFIRMASI's approach to AI deployment in classrooms serving vulnerable and marginalized children.

Critical Empathy as Method
Child-Centered Ethics
Humanizing Pedagogy
Equity Before Efficiency
Scholarly Courage

Research Focus

Figured Worlds & Identity Formation in Elementary SchoolingCritical Pedagogy and Humanizing EducationAI Ethics in Early Childhood and Elementary EducationSymbolic Violence and Ritual Harm in SchoolingSecond Language Acquisition in Multilingual ClassroomsMulticultural Teaching and Culturally Responsive PedagogyHuman Development and Child Psychology

Education

M.A. in Elementary Education
Texas State University, San Marcos · LPDP Scholar
Bachelor's Degree in Elementary Teacher Education
Indonesia

Selected Work

Figured Worlds, Class Hegemony, School Rituals, and AI: Ethnographic and Ethical Perspectives on Identity, Harm, and Humanizing Pedagogy in Education
2026 · AERA Annual Meeting, Los Angeles · Roundtable: Teaching with AI: Identities, Challenges, and Burnout — Apr 9–10, 2026